Chatter Tongue Gossip

Thoughts on Love, Sex & Entertainment

Janet Jackson – ARRIVES AT MICHAEL’S WITH MOVING VANS

a1

It was reported that this morning, Saturday, June 27, 2009,  Janet Jackson and two moving trucks arrived to the Los Angeles home of Michael Jackson.

The Associated Press reports Jackson arrived at Michael Jackson’s Holmby Hills residence wearing dark glasses and went directly into the deceased Jackson’s home, where outside two moving trucks were parked that had arrived shortly before.

About eight movers were seen entering the property with dollies and packing equipment, says the AP.

It us not immediately clear who sent the movers or what items they could be taking out of the residence.

This behavior really has this ladies curiosity peaked.  From past experience, I would expect my relatives to start circling like buzzards when a relatives passes but I am shocked at Janet’s behavior. 

Is she strictly looking toward personal gain?  Is she trying to same the family a months rent on the $100,000 a month mansion?   Or is she removing evidence that may taint the deceased “King of Pop’s” already tarnished reputation?

 

You can find this and other articles regarding Michael Jackson on our home page.  Just click on this link   wttp://womensthougths.wordpress.com/  Hope to see you there!  

We would Love to hear from you!  Click on comments below and tell us what you think.

Advertisements

June 27, 2009 - Posted by | Celebrity Gossip, Michael Jackson | , ,

8 Comments »

  1. I suppose it’s impossible to know her motives. Is she one of the many vultures we’re soon to see, or possibly trying to protect his things from those vultures, maybe for his kids?? Only time will tell…

    Another fascinating fact (at least I never knew it) I heard during the past few days when there’s nothing on TV but reactions from everyone in the world — Michael’s 3 children were NOT biologically his own. He hired a sperm doner (and his ex-wife and the doner know who it is). Add one more vulture in the mix to make a grab at the children. Michael will be turning over in his grave before he’s even burried…

    Comment by trickeybusiness | June 27, 2009 | Reply

    • You are so right…..I haven’t heard about the kids being the product of a sperm doner, but it’s really no big surprise.

      I would hope that the Jackson’s moved quickly before the “other” vultures stepped in. You can just imagine how many people would be trying to remove items from the house. If I’m not mistaken, wasn’t there supposed to be an auction for MJ’s stuff a few months ago? I remember it being called off, but don’t remember if it was due to Michael not wanting it or no interest from the public. Hmmm…..

      Comment by Cinoda Reed | June 28, 2009 | Reply

  2. FUCK YOU ASSHOLE! DONT QUESTION JANET’S MOTIVES! SHE LOVED HER BROTHER! HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE HER OF PERSONAL GAIN! SHE HAS PLENTY OF HER OWN, TO NOT HAVE TO CAPITALIZE OFF HER BROTHER! I am disgusted at this post!

    Comment by Disgusted | June 28, 2009 | Reply

    • I see we have a Democratic Liberal among us… Yes, I find useing all caps very effective.. Dumb Ass…

      Here let me type louder so you can hear me !!!

      IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS YOU WILL NOTICE THAT MJ’S FAMILY WILL BE CIRCLING LIKE BUZZARDS… WE WILL SEE WHAT YOU SAY THEN.. A S S H O L E . . . .

      Comment by Big Daddy | June 28, 2009 | Reply

  3. i hate all of you people! you disgust me and make me want to vomit! bunch of losers accusing people of evil toward their loved ones just to get a story! ugh! you deserve to be beat to a bloody pulp within inches of your life! fuckin assholes

    Comment by Disgusted | June 28, 2009 | Reply

    • Disgusted, Hun, have you ever looked into seeking some anger management classes? I’m sure they have some in your area…

      Comment by Big Daddy | June 28, 2009 | Reply

    • I take it you disagree with the post? Heck, just say so next time.

      Comment by Cinoda Reed | June 28, 2009 | Reply

  4. Dear Disgusted,
    You really took the post the wrong way. I love Janet also. More than you will ever know. However, there is some reason for her to take ONLY two vans.

    I’m sure that if she was moving his stuff she would need more than two vans.

    I don’t doubt that she loved Michael and yes I do believe that she would remove stuff from the house if it were to preserve his reputation.

    And although she may not be looking toward personal gain for herself, was she be removing stuff from either being taken by another relative or maybe by the staff…

    But there has to be a reason: 1,She did this rather than another famile member and 2, why she only needed 2 vans..

    Can you answer this question?

    Comment by margieweatherbes | June 28, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: